跳至内容
The greater-good defence : an essay on the rationality of faith 線上預覽
關閉線上預覽

The greater-good defence : an essay on the rationality of faith

作者: Melville Y Stewart
出版商: New York : St. Martin's Press, 1993.
版本/格式:   打印圖書 : 英語所有版本和格式的總覽
提要:
Several defences, viewed in this study as specifications or 'offspring' of the 'parent' greater-good defence, have been formulated in response to the charge that Christianity is untenable because God's existence is incompatible with evil's existence. In this first book-length study of the parent defence, Stewart begins with careful definitions of the omni-attributes central to the dispute: omnipotence, omniscience,  再讀一些...
未連接到Bethel Libraries的網路上。 若想存取線上内容和服務,可能需要先獲得你的圖書館的認證。 Off-campus WorldCat
獲取此資料的線上副本... 獲取此資料的線上副本...

在圖書館查詢

正在搜尋資料的館藏地以及館藏狀態... 正在搜尋資料的館藏地以及館藏狀態...

WorldCat

在全球的圖書館館藏查詢
全世界的圖書館擁有此資料

詳細書目

文件類型 圖書
所有的作者/貢獻者: Melville Y Stewart
ISBN: 0312080956 9780312080952
OCLC系統控制編碼: 25412328
描述: xi, 202 pages ; 22 cm
内容: Omnipotence, omniscience, and omnibenevolence --
The greater-good defence --
Derivations of greater-good defence --
The free will defence specification --
Growth-to-moral-maturity / soul-growth defence specifiaction --
O Feliz Culpa, redemption, and the greater-good defence.
責任: Melville Y. Stewart.

摘要:

Several defences, viewed in this study as specifications or 'offspring' of the 'parent' greater-good defence, have been formulated in response to the charge that Christianity is untenable because God's existence is incompatible with evil's existence. In this first book-length study of the parent defence, Stewart begins with careful definitions of the omni-attributes central to the dispute: omnipotence, omniscience, omnibenevolence. The parent defence is traced to tenets of theism and variant accounts of the defence considered. Plantinga's modal free-will defence and Hick's and Yandell's soul-growth specifications are carefully analyzed and several difficulties resolved. An original formulation of a redemption specification and an original account of the origin of moral evil are offered. Stewart argues that the defences are rightly viewed as a family of defences falling under the greater-good heading, and that they comprise a complementary apologetic complex that refutes the claim of inconsistency.
正在擷取有關此資料的註釋 正在擷取有關此資料的註釋

評論

讀者提供的評論

標籤

成爲第一個
確認申請

你可能已經申請過這份資料。若還是想申請,請選確認。

關閉視窗

請登入WorldCat 

没有帳號嗎?你可很容易的 建立免費的帳號.