跳到内容
The greater-good defence : an essay on the rationality of faith 预览资料
关闭预览资料

The greater-good defence : an essay on the rationality of faith

著者: Melville Y Stewart
出版商: New York : St. Martin's Press, 1993.
版本/格式:   打印图书 : 英语查看所有的版本和格式
提要:
Several defences, viewed in this study as specifications or 'offspring' of the 'parent' greater-good defence, have been formulated in response to the charge that Christianity is untenable because God's existence is incompatible with evil's existence. In this first book-length study of the parent defence, Stewart begins with careful definitions of the omni-attributes central to the dispute: omnipotence, omniscience,  再读一些...
未连接到Bethel Libraries的网络上。 如果你想访问在线内容和联系服务部门,可能先要得到你们图书馆的认证。 Off-campus WorldCat
取得资料的在线复本... 取得资料的在线复本...

在图书馆查找

正在查找此资料的位置以及馆藏信息... 正在查找此资料的位置以及馆藏信息...

WorldCat

在全球的图书馆查找
全世界的图书馆都拥有这资料

详细书目

文档类型 图书
所有的著者/提供者: Melville Y Stewart
ISBN: 0312080956 9780312080952
OCLC号码: 25412328
描述: xi, 202 pages ; 22 cm
内容: Omnipotence, omniscience, and omnibenevolence --
The greater-good defence --
Derivations of greater-good defence --
The free will defence specification --
Growth-to-moral-maturity / soul-growth defence specifiaction --
O Feliz Culpa, redemption, and the greater-good defence.
责任: Melville Y. Stewart.

摘要:

Several defences, viewed in this study as specifications or 'offspring' of the 'parent' greater-good defence, have been formulated in response to the charge that Christianity is untenable because God's existence is incompatible with evil's existence. In this first book-length study of the parent defence, Stewart begins with careful definitions of the omni-attributes central to the dispute: omnipotence, omniscience, omnibenevolence. The parent defence is traced to tenets of theism and variant accounts of the defence considered. Plantinga's modal free-will defence and Hick's and Yandell's soul-growth specifications are carefully analyzed and several difficulties resolved. An original formulation of a redemption specification and an original account of the origin of moral evil are offered. Stewart argues that the defences are rightly viewed as a family of defences falling under the greater-good heading, and that they comprise a complementary apologetic complex that refutes the claim of inconsistency.
有关这份资料的检索注释 有关这份资料的检索注释

评论

用户提供的评论

标签

争取是第一个!
确认申请

你可能已经申请过这份资料。如果还是想申请,请选确认。

关闭窗口

请登入WorldCat 

没有张号吗?很容易就可以 建立免费的账号.